My Investing Philosophy
I've had a few folks ask recently if I subscribe to any particular philosophy of investing -- if I'm an aggressive growth investor, or a Graham and Buffett-following value investor, or a buy-and-holder or frequent trader.
Well, it's hard to say what kind of investor I am -- and I definitely invest differently with the "play money" that I talk about here than I do in my employer sponsored retirement accounts.
It's easiest to say what I am not -- I am not a committed low-PE value investor or a dividend hawk, though I'm happy to receive dividends and buy on the cheap sometimes, and I am not a momentum investor or day trader and generally don't make short-term moves.
I think I can generally sum up my stock investing philosophy in a few rules.
I generally do not invest in companies where my investment thesis is predicated on a short term event or a near-term catalyst -- for example, I generally wouldn't buy a biotech in the months before an FDA decision with a plan to ride it through the decision and then sell. I only add companies to my portfolio that I see as having a bright long-term future, and I don't plan to sell in the near future.
I do trade in options on occasion, though I almost never write about those because most people couldn't care less and, frankly, I'm no expert and probably shouldn't even do it. Generally, if I'm tempted to make a short term play on a company I'll consider doing so with a very small option position just to satisfy my gambling instinct. I am wrong as often as I'm right in the short term, probably more often.
That's not to say that I hold every company forever -- I have sold plenty of holdings, and some have been very briefly held over the years. Recently, I sold Great Wolf after just a few months because it became clear to me that the company was not as well managed as I had hoped, and was not as well positioned against their competitors. I also sold Cendant after holding it for less than a year, not only because performance was disappointing to some degree but because I thought their plan to break up was foolish and I didn't want to be a part of it.
I invest in individual stocks because I like to research and understand individual companies that are doing extraordinary things. I want to own companies that can grow significantly over many years, and I generally focus most of my energy on small cap or undercovered companies because I think small investors generally have an advantage in those areas and those companies are usually easier to fully understand.
I reserve the right to be irrational, and to make dumb mistakes. And if this ever stops being entertaining I might do almost as well by buying a few good mutual funds -- it would certainly take less time.
Well, it's hard to say what kind of investor I am -- and I definitely invest differently with the "play money" that I talk about here than I do in my employer sponsored retirement accounts.
It's easiest to say what I am not -- I am not a committed low-PE value investor or a dividend hawk, though I'm happy to receive dividends and buy on the cheap sometimes, and I am not a momentum investor or day trader and generally don't make short-term moves.
I think I can generally sum up my stock investing philosophy in a few rules.
- Buy with the intention of owning a company for a long time.
- Diversify significantly. I'm not confident enough in my wisdom to invest in only a very small number of companies, and I find it interesting to follow many companies at once. At this point I'm overdiversified and I'd like to winnow down the list, but I think I will likely always hold a minimum of 25 companies or so (right now it's nearer 40).
- Only sell for very good reasons. My past mistakes in selling early have dramatically overshadowed my mistakes of holding too long. All else being equal, once I've committed to a stock I'd like to stick with it and I need to have a more compelling reason to sell than I need to buy. I'd rather hold a company and ignore it then sell out of impatience.
- I hear about a company from reading in the media, seeing them as a newsletter pick, culling them from a stock screen, or encountering their products in the real world. I put compelling companies on my watchlists and begin getting an understanding of their business model and prospects.
- I buy an initial small position after researching and becoming convinced that a company has excellent growth prospects, is reasonably fairly priced, and has solid management. I'm not terribly price sensitive with this first purchase.
- I continue to monitor the company, follow their filings and research their business more deeply, and look for a better reason to fill out the position -- that might be a new line of business or unexpectedly quick success, or it might be a drop in price that presents a buying opportunity, or a reassessment of the company's fundamental prospects after doing further research. By the time I buy a second position in a company I should be quite committed to it and know it very well. I pay more attention to valuation when I fill out a position, and I'm likely to do a much more specific analysis of growth prospects and relative value for the company.
- Finally, I try to have a very, very good reason before selling. A drop in price is not enough of a reason for me to sell, on it's own, and I try to be much more aggressive when buying than when selling. When significant changes occur at a company, I reassess and see if there are convincing reasons to refute my initial investment thesis -- if management is not as capable or trustworthy as I had previously thought, or their business appears significantly impaired by events I didn't foresee, or the company is otherwise showing itself to not be the company I thought it was, selling might be a reasonable reaction. I'm more likely to sell a small position than a large one, just because those are the companies I generally don't know as well and am likely to overestimate early in my relationship with them. I do also occasionally sell small portions of my holdings to take profits if I think a stock has gotten well ahead of itself or is overvalued, as I did in early 2006 with Vertex and Middleby -- but since I'm often wrong on this, I sell only a small portion, perhaps as much as enough to recoup my initial investment if it has more than doubled ... oftentimes, these stocks I sell will continue to climb, which makes me gnash my teeth.
I generally do not invest in companies where my investment thesis is predicated on a short term event or a near-term catalyst -- for example, I generally wouldn't buy a biotech in the months before an FDA decision with a plan to ride it through the decision and then sell. I only add companies to my portfolio that I see as having a bright long-term future, and I don't plan to sell in the near future.
I do trade in options on occasion, though I almost never write about those because most people couldn't care less and, frankly, I'm no expert and probably shouldn't even do it. Generally, if I'm tempted to make a short term play on a company I'll consider doing so with a very small option position just to satisfy my gambling instinct. I am wrong as often as I'm right in the short term, probably more often.
That's not to say that I hold every company forever -- I have sold plenty of holdings, and some have been very briefly held over the years. Recently, I sold Great Wolf after just a few months because it became clear to me that the company was not as well managed as I had hoped, and was not as well positioned against their competitors. I also sold Cendant after holding it for less than a year, not only because performance was disappointing to some degree but because I thought their plan to break up was foolish and I didn't want to be a part of it.
I invest in individual stocks because I like to research and understand individual companies that are doing extraordinary things. I want to own companies that can grow significantly over many years, and I generally focus most of my energy on small cap or undercovered companies because I think small investors generally have an advantage in those areas and those companies are usually easier to fully understand.
I reserve the right to be irrational, and to make dumb mistakes. And if this ever stops being entertaining I might do almost as well by buying a few good mutual funds -- it would certainly take less time.










