One Guy's Investments

This site is no longer being actively maintained, new articles are not being added and portfolio comments are no longer current. Please see www.StockGumshoe.com for current commentary from the author.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005 -- Subscribe free

My Investing Philosophy

I've had a few folks ask recently if I subscribe to any particular philosophy of investing -- if I'm an aggressive growth investor, or a Graham and Buffett-following value investor, or a buy-and-holder or frequent trader.

Well, it's hard to say what kind of investor I am -- and I definitely invest differently with the "play money" that I talk about here than I do in my employer sponsored retirement accounts.

It's easiest to say what I am not -- I am not a committed low-PE value investor or a dividend hawk, though I'm happy to receive dividends and buy on the cheap sometimes, and I am not a momentum investor or day trader and generally don't make short-term moves.

I think I can generally sum up my stock investing philosophy in a few rules.
  • Buy with the intention of owning a company for a long time.
  • Diversify significantly. I'm not confident enough in my wisdom to invest in only a very small number of companies, and I find it interesting to follow many companies at once. At this point I'm overdiversified and I'd like to winnow down the list, but I think I will likely always hold a minimum of 25 companies or so (right now it's nearer 40).
  • Only sell for very good reasons. My past mistakes in selling early have dramatically overshadowed my mistakes of holding too long. All else being equal, once I've committed to a stock I'd like to stick with it and I need to have a more compelling reason to sell than I need to buy. I'd rather hold a company and ignore it then sell out of impatience.
That "philosophy", if you can even call it that, translates into some specific behavior that I try to follow when investing. Basically, my relationship with a company follows this pattern most of the time:
  1. I hear about a company from reading in the media, seeing them as a newsletter pick, culling them from a stock screen, or encountering their products in the real world. I put compelling companies on my watchlists and begin getting an understanding of their business model and prospects.
  2. I buy an initial small position after researching and becoming convinced that a company has excellent growth prospects, is reasonably fairly priced, and has solid management. I'm not terribly price sensitive with this first purchase.
  3. I continue to monitor the company, follow their filings and research their business more deeply, and look for a better reason to fill out the position -- that might be a new line of business or unexpectedly quick success, or it might be a drop in price that presents a buying opportunity, or a reassessment of the company's fundamental prospects after doing further research. By the time I buy a second position in a company I should be quite committed to it and know it very well. I pay more attention to valuation when I fill out a position, and I'm likely to do a much more specific analysis of growth prospects and relative value for the company.
  4. Finally, I try to have a very, very good reason before selling. A drop in price is not enough of a reason for me to sell, on it's own, and I try to be much more aggressive when buying than when selling. When significant changes occur at a company, I reassess and see if there are convincing reasons to refute my initial investment thesis -- if management is not as capable or trustworthy as I had previously thought, or their business appears significantly impaired by events I didn't foresee, or the company is otherwise showing itself to not be the company I thought it was, selling might be a reasonable reaction. I'm more likely to sell a small position than a large one, just because those are the companies I generally don't know as well and am likely to overestimate early in my relationship with them. I do also occasionally sell small portions of my holdings to take profits if I think a stock has gotten well ahead of itself or is overvalued, as I did in early 2006 with Vertex and Middleby -- but since I'm often wrong on this, I sell only a small portion, perhaps as much as enough to recoup my initial investment if it has more than doubled ... oftentimes, these stocks I sell will continue to climb, which makes me gnash my teeth.
I am perfectly willing to invest in "growth" or "value" companies as long as the growth rate and the valuation seem acceptable given my assumptions about the marketplace, or to invest overseas or in the US -- though I don't trade on foreign exchanges so I have so far restricted myself to ADRs and funds for my foreign holdings. I try to avoid OTC and Bulletin Board stocks, but I have broken that rule twice and I may do so again someday if the company is compelling enough (and especially if that company is likely to move up to the big exchanges eventually).

I generally do not invest in companies where my investment thesis is predicated on a short term event or a near-term catalyst -- for example, I generally wouldn't buy a biotech in the months before an FDA decision with a plan to ride it through the decision and then sell. I only add companies to my portfolio that I see as having a bright long-term future, and I don't plan to sell in the near future.

I do trade in options on occasion, though I almost never write about those because most people couldn't care less and, frankly, I'm no expert and probably shouldn't even do it. Generally, if I'm tempted to make a short term play on a company I'll consider doing so with a very small option position just to satisfy my gambling instinct. I am wrong as often as I'm right in the short term, probably more often.

That's not to say that I hold every company forever -- I have sold plenty of holdings, and some have been very briefly held over the years. Recently, I sold Great Wolf after just a few months because it became clear to me that the company was not as well managed as I had hoped, and was not as well positioned against their competitors. I also sold Cendant after holding it for less than a year, not only because performance was disappointing to some degree but because I thought their plan to break up was foolish and I didn't want to be a part of it.

I invest in individual stocks because I like to research and understand individual companies that are doing extraordinary things. I want to own companies that can grow significantly over many years, and I generally focus most of my energy on small cap or undercovered companies because I think small investors generally have an advantage in those areas and those companies are usually easier to fully understand.

I reserve the right to be irrational, and to make dumb mistakes. And if this ever stops being entertaining I might do almost as well by buying a few good mutual funds -- it would certainly take less time.

Keep up with One Guy's Investments, Free Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Comments:
Rotshild said he made a fortune by buying too late and selling too early.

Sometimes taking your profits is a good move, even if the stock still rises afterwards.

Sometimes cutting your losses can be a good decision too. I just cut two of mine, they were too painful to watch everyday.

contrary to what I said before, maybe you should consider getting rid of that FARO you're dragging and put your money, however little its is after such a huge drop, at work in some place else.

(Or maybe I'm just too much into that new book I'm reading and want to sell everything that declines .01%)
 
I imagine he was being a bit flippant -- if I remember correctly, he made a fortune by starting with a small fortune.

I would be interested in "cutting my losses" only if I thought the company was no longer worth owning -- if I would buy it today at the available price, then what does it matter what I paid for it? (unless we're worrying about taxes).

FARO is still on my mind, I haven't had time to delve into it in more detail -- but it also illustrates some of the virtues of selling patience. If I had sold when I first decided that I needed to look at the company with a more jaundiced eye, I would have sold my shares about 10% below where they are today. I think I still have a little time to make that decision.

And as for selling to take a profit, I'm hoping to have several thousand percent gainers in my portfolio before I retire -- it's hard to get to 1000% if you sell at 50%. I do take profits on occasion, but only when something about the company concerns me -- I don't try to sell high and buy back low, I don't believe that I'll often be capable of making timing calls like that.

Thanks for the comments, as always.
 
I think what I was trying to say is that if you have a losing stock, no matter what you believe it'll do in the future, you could do better with another winning stock.

Maybe FARO bounced back 10% since your first thought about selling, therefore making your decision look good. But maybe you could have sold, put the money elsewhere and made 20%.

However, this is probably more true if you invest for the short or mid term. If you're long term on most stocks (which seems to be your case) I guess keeping it makes sense (saves the hassle of looking for a new pick, and support your long term belief about the company)

Graham and Buffet made millions by buy and hold (Buffet is probably suffering on his recently acquired PIR (Pier 1) but I guess in 10 years he'll show up a 547% increase) so there's really not one single way to make it work.

For the several thousand percent gainers in your portfolio, I'd bet on SPDV or ISRG, keep that in mind when you send invitations to your retirement party.
 
I hear you. And I'm sure I will be more and more tempted to sell something I'm losing faith in if I see something very appealing to add to the portfolio -- I'll never be as disciplined as I might like to be, but one thing I'm pretty sure of is that I'm not going to be able to predict how a stock will move over a period of just a few months.

Sometimes I'll convince myself that I can do just that, and I'll talk myself into acting on those feelings on occasion, but I'm pretty sure in retrospect I'll turn out to have been less than half right. I'll definitely never have the patience of Warren Buffett, but almost no one does.
 
I am a big fan of your blog and have it fed directly to myyahoo and mygoogle pages so i can read the latest posting and keep up to date.

i really like your analysis and think you are as good a booyah boy as cramer, just that you dont have a show :-)

in any case, i am very similar to you - in terms of my retail investor mentality and tracking and analyzing my picks and sales etc., i am inspired by you and want to blog. can you post here letting us know how you created this blog site? and how you get your advertisements going here etc.,? i am curious. thanks and keep up the great work!
 
Hi One Guy:

40 stocks seems like an awful lot. How do you manage to keep track of so many?
 
It is a lot -- I should probably pare down to 25 or so in the interest of improved sanity, but every time I sell off a few the new candidates start coming out of the woodwork.

It's easy to monitor the news on each company, though it gets tough to read up on all of them in detail when they file earnings or to listen to all of the conference calls.

I generally divide my companies into a few categories. The ones that I watch most closely are the large positions that are more volatile than average -- stocks like SeaDrill, ISRG, Click Commerce until it was bought out, and Gol.

I also watch closely a few companies that I'm considering for position adjustments -- either sales or purchases, or that I think have near-term catalysts that I need to pay attention to. Most of those are smaller holdings that I'm trying to decide whether I should double down on or cut my losses, companies like MYGN and CVTX and BBBB fit this mold, and for them I have specific benchmarks I'm looking for relating to patents or approvals or other specific news catalysts that will help me decide ... and it's pretty easy to track that kind of basic news, since I don't have the illusion that I'm ever going to be the first one to hear the news or that I'll be able to trade out of or add to a position before the news impacts the bigger investors out there.

So the short answer is, I don't keep track of them all religiously -- I scan for developments for all my companies every day, but that takes just five or ten minutes. I pay much closer attention to my largest positions, or to companies I'm wavering over, and I almost ignore companies that I know I'm extremely unlikely to sell or buy more of in the near future, regardless of news (like Rayonier or Berkshire Hathaway or Harris & Harris, for example).
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Google
Stock Gumshoe's Latest Sponsored Links:
Check Stock Prices
 Symbol
A-Z market search               
Go
finance research tool powered by ADVFN

Advertise on blogs Blogarama - The Blogs
Bloggernity blog search directory
Blog Catalog
Find Blogs in the Blog Directory

PhatInvestor
Listed on BlogShares
Technorati Blog Finder
Top-Blogs Directory
Directory of Investing Blogs
Business Blog Top Sites
Today

Powered by Blogger

More blogs about investments.