Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.2 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
  1.  Report Post# 1
    Other than taking finance in college I don't really know the technical side of stock picks - fundamental and technical analysis. Support and such....

    Therefore I have no idea on how to pick a stock on my own. There seems to be no good way I have read - you can do all the analysis but the market can move totally against a pick. The market is so irrational and emotional. Also company management has to be taken into consideration as do all the other aspects like market share, competitive advantage, cash in the bank, etc...

    I am assuming this is too big a task for me since I have a regular job and don't really have time to do all this for each stock I choose.

    I have researched this to be one of the better forums and I have a general question.

    Is it possible to pick stocks on my own without putting in 40 hours a week? Is it advisable to follow some of these news letters - I also belong to True Wealth which I am not so impressed with.

    I do my own investing following the Oxford Club recommendations BUT the problem I have is getting in at the exact price they pick a stock at. By the time I check the stock the price has usually gone up. Their newsletter may say keep buying. So I have bought at their recommendation at some higher prices than their initial picks and I am now getting stopped out on many stocks and many are currently down quite a bit.

    For example Oxford will say sell X stock for a 23% profit but that only includes the initial stock price on the day they recommended it. It does not include the fact that the price goes up and they recommend you keep buying at higher prices. So they recommend a stock at $20 and it climbs to $35 and they say keep buying. So I buy at $35 and the stock goes down to $25 and they call it a 23% gain - yeah if you bought it initially at the $20 it is. But at $35 I take a loss.
    So their system is not working.

    So I am thinking these news letters may not be so good due to this timing issue.
  2.  Report Post# 2
    I subscribed to Oxford in March, 2004 and bought their highest recommendation (VAR) at 43.70.

    This is what happened:

    1-30-2006 - 60.24 (I should have sold when it began dropping)

    9-18-2007 - 38.44 (I could have gotten back in here)

    8-19-2008 - 64.72 (I should have sold when it began dropping)

    Today - 51.55 (I'm still holding with a small gain that could have been much greater)

    I didn't continue my subscription past the first year, but Oxford kept recommending VAR through the years (according to the teasers they kept sending me). I don't know their current position on Varian.

    It's easy to buy good stocks. It's much harder to know when to sell.

    Travis (Stock Gumshoe) offers excellent analysis of most teaser stocks. (Please read the Comments.)

    The traders on this site have wonderful advice and suggestions. I wish I'd followed more of them. I think you'll do better listening to farley 5 and spreadtrader than you will subscribing to newsletters. Even the newsletters that tell you when to sell (like ChangeWave) usually send out alerts in the middle of the day. Those with full time jobs may not see the mid-day recommendations until they've sent the stock soaring (an extra cost for you), just as they don't see sell alerts until they've caused a substantial drop in price (an extra loss for you). It may not be an intentional 'pump and dump' but it acts in a similar manner.

    Just remember to use STOPs as farley 5 suggests, or protective PUTs as spreadtrader suggests.

    I thought I knew a lot about stocks when I began reading the posts on the Forum, but I was looking at the 'story' not the technical attributes. Please pay attention to both (or follow others who do). I've lost a lot of money in this market, but I've learned a lot.

    If you go slow and read everything on this site, you'll be fine.
  3.  Report Post# 3
    Hi shredmonster,

    If you read many of my posts (and there are probably too many....lol) you'll know that I have very little respect for the timing abilities of newsletter writers.

    You should understand there is A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE between picking the right stock and picking the right time to buy (or sell) it. They are two entirely different skills. (BTW, the "exact price" of the Oxford Club's "picks", or most any newsletter stock picker for that matter, is usually highly irrelevant, so don't lose sleep over it.)

    Most newsletter writers cannot effectively time entries or exits (and yes, at least as important as the decision to buy is the decision to sell, as many shell-shocked investors are presently finding out).

    You can learn how to trade, but it takes time; and the appropriate psychological mindset. Hopefully, you're young and can take several years to read and put into practice what you learn in order to develop the experience to do it well yourself. If not, there are excellent professional money managers who post at this site and at least one "woman with portfolio" who also posts here and who has an excellent website for folks who want to learn and obtain good stock investment advice at a reasonable cost. Also, I would be remiss if I didn't quickly add that the Gumshoe is an excellent resource for in depth ideas and separating the bad from the worst newsletter writers. Becoming an "irregular" is a very good thing.

    My personal orientation is commodity futures, but I can send you a list of recommended reading for new traders and a few websites that have been helpful to me if you "whisper" me your email address. Also, let me know if you're interested in learning about options.

    Good luck.
    • CommentAuthordestry
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2008
     Report Post# 4
    The investment letters to which I suscribe, pretty much provide what
    I want...Ideas and thoughts. The problem is having enough experience to know what you want. The first letter I ever took was the old "Personal Finance"...'Just stock
    ideas. I think if you blindly follow every recommendation, you'll be dissappointed.
    I just ignore buying anything I'm not interested in, to begin with...
    If the idea interests me; Makes sense; And I see a long-term likelihood
    of growth,etc...If I can justify a long-term ownership...Then I can get a feel for it's trading opportunities....It sounds Dark Ages, compared to the excellent advise
    "spreadtrader,farley5, and wwp offer...However, I've had long-term ideas I've
    traded 3 or 4 times successfully (Sometimes, I'm just surprise by the sudden interest, and take profits in self-defense...I get surprised that way alot, now that I think of it...But why not?)
    You need to start with what interests you..That way you trade in positions you have knowledge about...And that you form a judgement of the authors expertise...
  4.  Report Post# 5
    Destry's right about that. You need a filter. That strategy has been successful for Peter Lynch and Warren Buffet.

    The stategy can be dangerous if you continue to hold a 'broken' stock because you like the product or 'story'.

    Sometimes you get lucky, but you have to recognize your good fortune. I placed a limit order to sell a portion of my stock in a small Linux company. It sold at the opening, way above my limit price. I called to find out what happened and discovered that the small company had been acquired by the hottest Linux company around. I should have sold it all, because that was the highest price the stock reached. I didn't and ultimately sold the remainder at a much lower price.

    Please be smarter than I was.
    • CommentAuthorTV Guy
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2008
     Report Post# 6
    Newsletter Score Card ? Well, The Gumshoe has graciously provided us with a TRACKING CHART to see how these infamous Newsletter Gurus have done. The chart 2008 + 2007 says it all.

    Go to the main page and click on "Tracking".

    Remember RED means down the toilet....GREEN means they got lucky. Seriously I am amazed at HOW BADLY their recommendations, across the board, have been !!

    Nice to have a chart like this to place everything into perspective.
  5.  Report Post# 7
    Wow you guys are really helpful! Looks like I have my work cut out for me.
    • CommentAuthorTV Guy
    • CommentTimeOct 7th 2008
     Report Post# 8
    yah shred....it does involve some "work". But what are your options?

    The easy one...go into a guys office (or read a newsletter) they tell you what to do....bingo / bango and you loose..."whatever"...20, 30, 50%. Thanks a whole lot. Did you learn or know what happened? Nope. All you know is you LOST. Blame it on the "advisor".

    The harder one?. Well, reading books, checking charts, getting input from great guys on this site. You don't always "win"...but at least you have taken charge and been accountable for how you are investing your hard-earned money.
  6.  Report Post# 9
    In all honesty I looked at that tracking chart. I did not find it very useful -

    1) It does not track an entire portfolio of any newsletter - just some specific recommendations

    2) Some of the Oxford Club picks I saw on the tracking chart I did not recall seeing recommended by the Oxford Club like NUAN in 2008

    3) If you set trailing stops a person would have been stopped out of the losers before they reach some of the ridiculous losses on the tracking chart and factoring that into the performance of any given letter you will get an improved performance overall for that respective letter.

    Tracking the overall performance of an entire letter would be helpful - and time consuming I know.
  7.  Report Post# 10
    You raise several points worth comment. First, most market newsletters ONLY tell you what and when to buy. They do not tell you when to sell (except some say to use a 25% stop, trailing, protective, whatever). Most professional traders and portfolio managers will tell you that 25% protective stop loss is too much to lose....stated otherwise, over time you will go broke. That is why timing your entry is as important as the specific security you choose. Even more important is the decision to exit, whether to take a loss or a profit. Newsletter writers give grossly inadequate advice for timing exits. In my view, the reason the newsletters want you to use 25% stops is their acknowledgement that they don't know anything useful about timing entries or exits.

    The stuff I sent you from Van Tharp on position sizing and risk control are critical skills to develop as a trader. If you read his book "Trade Your Way to Financial Freedom" he'll tell you that it is the difference between success and failure as a trader over the long haul. (Sadly, for some it is a short haul.) No newsletter writer that I know of tells you anything about how much to buy or more importantly, how much to risk (relative to the size of your portfolio) of what you do buy.

    Your idea of using stops is good. However, stops should be set in relation to logical support points on the chart so that you don't get caught in the "noise" and lose a perfectly good position to "stop runners". If the stop you must set is too wide to fit the risk parameters of your portfolio, you have to have the discipline to pass on the trade, regardless of how great the "story" may be. One good example is Berkshire Hathaway. A great stock, yes? But you'd better have a lot of money to be able to withstand the risk of temporary (or extended) drawdowns.

    In my view, tracking overall newsletter performance is worthless. Use the newsletters (if you must) for ideas (but you can get good ideas here for nothing). With the ideas, do your research, and apply what you learn about trading.
    Certainly trading is not easy, otherwise, everyone would be doing it. But newsletters are mere sources of ideas. Their track records are meaningless for many reasons, some of which I haven't gone into.
  8.  Report Post# 11
    Spreadtrader very interesting points. Since it appears I know very little about what the hell I am doing I think I will take my current portfolio and move my trail stops down to 15% for my own piece of mind. I have had them all at 25% which I thought would be safe - of course thats 25% from their high point not from the purchase price. Not to many high points right now with the dow near 9000.

    And recently I have had to sell a lot of stuff.

    So I think the first thing I am going to have to learn to do is figure out where to set my trail stops according to your above advice.

    The other thing is I have been letting my winners ride. And I think what you are saying is I have to figure out when to sell them.

    I have had no more than 4% of my portfolio in any position and I have followed the Oxford Clubs allocation portfolio - 30% Domestic, 30% Foreign Stocks, 10% High Grade Bonds, 10% TIPs, 5% Precious Metals, 5% REITs and the other 10% I cant remember but I have it in cash right now.

    I do have some good ones - Nestle, PCL, LLL, GDX, BRKB (which has been a good one since I bought it), MBDFX.

    But I have gotten stopped out of lots of stuff recently. Kinda bummed the 25% trail stop is too generic. Darn.

    Thanks
    • CommentAuthorTV Guy
    • CommentTimeOct 9th 2008
     Report Post# 12
    spreadtrader.....ALWAYS LIKE your comments....you're a nice participant to this site !! thanks for taking the time to help us all out !!

    On the "newsletter thing"...(as I groan)....on this site there are incessant questions and input asked for: "Is this guy good ...is this guy bad?" I think you're right about "newsletters = ideas"....HOWEVER...but the reality is....most folks on this site are using? / wishing? / relying on?....the newsletter gurus to be "right". and a lot of people ACT on their advice....not just the "for ideas" angle.

    Why do I say this? Well because many posting start with: " I used this service and lost my shirt"....."I used this service and lost money for the last 6 months"....."I bought the recommendation and its down 42%"........." etc etc etc. What does that tell us? It tells us that people are TAKING ACTION on the recommendations and not merely using the teasers / stories / as IDEAS....but as stock picks. When they act on the "advice"....and the pick goes sour....the advisor / newsletter "advice" is questioned... then the ball rolls....yet again...."Which newsletter service have you found to be the most reliable ?"

    So the TECHNIQUES that you outline....as in trailing stops...insight into the commodity sectors....whatever....are the KEY. Within that people can get ideas....and make their own stock "picks". The ol' addage: give a person a fish and you can feed them for a DAY...teach them how to fish and you can feed them for a LIFETIME.

    If we go over the posts in the last....whatever...3 months....(and things have changed in that period....understatement).....let's go out on a limb:......

    >> newsletter services....stories....suggestions....are IDEAS. Ideas only. Here comes the provocative: don't invest in any of the picks. The feedback on this site more than validates this course of action. Who, if any, are "satisfied" with the newsletter gurus? Use the ideas...take the suggestions and DDD.....and further pick your own stocks.

    >> start a new thread....throw into the pot (via a whisper) what your "best" and favorite 2 stocks are (you can create this if you browse the various posts herein).

    >> start a "bible"....trailing stops....exits are actually more improtant than entry points.....sectors to watch (and these change of course)

    In essence, The Gumshoe has created our own "newsletter" and it is not fraught with hype, vested interests or the like...it's what WWP said...can't remember the exact adjective...but we are just normal schleps trying to get ahead in this quicksand.

    Well hells' bells....if I have to listen to anyone and act on anything....I'd sure take it from this group rather than the noise of the newsletters that clog my in-basket each day (especially now...since everyone has :"the answer".
  9.  Report Post# 13
    Shred, I'm not trying to pick on you, but you made another very interesting comment and I feel compelled to point it out to you because I think it applies to all of us to one extent or another.

    You said: "Since it appears I know very little about what the hell I am doing I think I will take my current portfolio and move my trail stops down to 15% for my own peace of mind."

    First off, you know enough to protect your capital. That puts you miles ahead of most people with money in the markets. (Mark my words, we're going to see a number of lawsuits/broker arbitrations over whether people in certain age groups were appropriately invested in stocks and stock options at this stage of their lives, but that's another story.) Anyway, your instinct to protect yourself from risk is a good one.

    Second, you've probably read in many places that you should decide upon where to exit based upon "your personal risk tolerance". For most people, that's an emotional decision, in line with your "peace of mind" comment. Stated otherwise, how much (emotional) pain can you stomach? Obviously, that expresses an emotional response. Yet, if you read much about the psychology of trading you will quickly learn that the best traders divorce emotion as much as possible from the whole trading equation. Essentially, the less you care, the better your potential to be successful (you still have to know what you're doing). Most people never understand that or more importantly, never confront themselves over the issue, because to a large extent it's impossible to effectively resolve.

    But minimizing emotion in trading can be achieved and it takes place in two steps: 1) gain knowledge; and 2) have a plan. Step #2 implies that you also have the discipline to execute the plan.

    So don't make specific changes to what you're doing based upon my comments in this forum. (I feel sorry for the gent who posted that he's invested in two mutual funds, has lost 40% of his money and now wants "someone" to help him decide what he should do next, but I really can't tell him). Rather, recognize the issue and resolve to learn about it so that you can make well informed decisions based upon a carefully thought out plan.

    My comments about position size and risk management were meant to emphasize that without considering those components "25%" is just a number, just as "15%" may not be useful. Here's what I mean. 25% of a hundred shares of a $5 stock is a helluva lot different than 15% of 1000 shares of a $50 stock.

    TV Guy, thanks for your comments. Sometimes I wonder whether what I'm communicating is very helpful because there are numerous components to "trading/investing". The analogy is communicating the essence of a horse by describing its rear end.
    • CommentAuthordharouff
    • CommentTimeOct 9th 2008
     Report Post# 14
    A place I have sent people who want to learn how fast they can loose money is http://www.marketocracy.com/ set up a fund and it will track you ideas.
  10.  Report Post# 15
    Spreadtrader: I am getting stopped out of so much right now but certain things I am not selling cause I know they will come back like Nestle. Market panic right now is the cause. I am not panicking.

    With regards to my stops - I put no more than 4% into any buy - so the analogy of 25% of a hundred shares of a $5 stock is a helluva lot different than 15% of 1000 shares of a $50 stock - I understand but does not apply since I put the same DOLLAR AMOUNT into each of my positions.

    I am not overly extended in any one stock position (however I have had 60% of my money in stocks). Currently though I am down but less than the market is down because of my trial stops.

    I am thinking the way to recover going forward is going to be when to recognize getting back in and scooping up the bargains - no? But I have a lot of reading to do to figure out when and what to buy.

    One of the things I am a little confused about in current reading - some people have made a lot of money being contrarians while others say never go against market trends. I don't quite understand this divergence of opinion.
  11.  Report Post# 16
    Yes, that's somewhat confusing, and different people may interpret this diiferently, but here's how I would explain it.

    There really is no divergence of opinion. Trend following is the predominant and best known trading/investing method. It permits the investor to take advantage of the prevailing move in the price of a security. The trick is understanding where to get on and to do that effectively you have to learn where a trend begins and where it may be ending. That's where "contrarians" come into the picture.

    By definition, trend followers "follow" someone, the crowd, it is said. Sometimes they follow right off the cliff. Contrarians don't follow the crowd. They want to set or lead the trend. They get in early either at the beginning or end and have strong stomachs because sometimes they get in way too early and have to ride out a steep drawdown or take small losses until they finally get the satisfaction of saying "I told you so".

    Either way, the path to success is "buy low and sell high" or "sell high and buy back low". A third and fourth alternative is "buy or sell both ends against the middle" and "buy and sell the middle", but we won't go into that right now.

    Hope this helps.
    • CommentAuthordestry
    • CommentTimeOct 10th 2008
     Report Post# 17
    I'm really simplistic compared to you guys...
    I'm in Oxford Club, and several others...I've a nagging suspicion I'm overlaped
    in a couple.....

    The only point I've ever tried to make is this: Look at the "free look"...
    Take out a short subscription...'You don't like it...Cancel and get all or most of your money back.
    Think you like them? Give it a year.
    I'm satisfied by very good and thoughtfull investment writing...I may not agree (If I never agree, that's my
    clue, I've made a mistake)...I may agree with the idea, but not the investment...If the idea leads to an investment I like better...They still get credit...If I make more money on an idea they're responsible for, than what I paid to subscribe...We'll get along. I like and respond to thorough research from a fundamental standpoint.
  12.  Report Post# 18
    So it doesn't sound like you rely upon the "hurry up, you must invest now or you'll miss out on this once in a lifetime opportunity" sales schtick with which most newsletter writers assail their readers; and as an experienced investor you don't time investment entries based upon their "advice" either.

    Unlike you, not everyone who buys newsletters understands their numerous and deep limitations......
    • CommentAuthordestry
    • CommentTimeOct 11th 2008
     Report Post# 19
    spreadtrader...I take a long time to decide on something.
    I've probably missed every hot deal that ever came along. It doesn't bother me a bit.
    For every one I miss; There are six more coming along behind.
    • CommentAuthorTV Guy
    • CommentTimeOct 11th 2008
     Report Post# 20
    I think the caution we are giving here is : "don't leap on the advice of a newsletter guru". And folks can say " Nah I would NEVER do that...I will always make up my own mind". Good for you. Well guess what? Many people want their hands-held and want to be told what to do...and they act on it.

    Heck, there have been TONS of teasers that I have read that make "total sense"....creative writing, sense of urgency, compelling arguments, LENGHTY pitches....all tend to makes one say: "well....SURE". THAT"S the magic and brilliance of the Gumshoe site...and indeed the Forum within it. It tempers that urge to ACT on some hype driven advertising piece. It peeks behind the curtain to tell us REALLY what is behind the hype.

    Sure people can, and should do "their due diligence"... a lot don't WANT to...it's too much work !!...and it places all accountability on YOU (gee, scary) It's better to subscribe to the Newsletter Guy and just act on what they tell me...'cause they know WAY more than I do !! (NOT)

    So I think the posts herein are mainly directed to:..... the newbies to the markets...or the people who are super-busy and have no time to do research, or the ones who would like it just "quick-and-easy". If you are in that category...don't get sucked in by newsletter guys. If you are NOT in those categories then you already have a sense of discretion already!! You can use them for "ideas", but not as literal "stock picks".
    • CommentAuthorfarley 5
    • CommentTimeOct 11th 2008
     Report Post# 21
    TV Guy nailed it! He says: "don't leap on the advice of a newsletter guru". Our Fearless Leader, Stock Gumshoe, has put together a unique resourse. Where could you get the invaluable advice from Spreadtrader and not pay him every 6 minutes like all JD's do? Where can you get the common sense advice from our own Woman With Portfolio? Add the insurance insight from Destry, the smart comments from ASAFP, the worldwise comments from Stockcrazy, and all of the others. If I forgot someone please forgive me. JIL does send me newsletters for my comments but I think that is breaking some copywrite laws so I cannot give back.

    It seems like the folks on this site are very giving. So, if you have an issue or concern, post it. Yes, I have hogged this forum but the whispers I get make it worthwhile. Have a great weekend and be sure to see the post at:

    http://oneguysinvestments.com/gumshoe/comments.php?DiscussionID=1452&page=1#Item_4

    SGS is famous.
    Thankful People: ibskj
    • CommentAuthordestry
    • CommentTimeOct 11th 2008
     Report Post# 22
    I did check that out...What a hoot.
    You crack me up....When were're not butting heads....'Wouldn't trade for either.