Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.2 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    • CommentAuthorBrdimkr
    • CommentTimeMay 31st 2007
     Report Post# 1
    Here is the site for the teaser from Taipan Network:
    http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/GRR/EGRRH430/?o=1257502&u=15596390&l=822617

    I apologize in advance if this has already been covered.

    The stock they are referring to, and I am 100% positive, is ENERGY RESOURCES of AUSTRALIA (AU:ERA).
  1.  Report Post# 2
    Thanks for the submission -- I've received this on email a couple times, including one other reader who proposed ERA as the solution, but I've never been able to confirm it completely, probably because, as a couple readers pointed out, they don't have all the facts precisely right. The chart is a good match, though, as long as you use Australian dollars, and everyone who submitted seems certain of this so I bow to your uranium knowledge.

    Just FYI for everyone: This is that MEGA-U308 teaser from DeHaemer with the GRESSOR report at Taipan, and it's been circulating for at least a month or two. It's essentially about Chinese insatiable demand for uranium, and the advantages given to this company by Cameco's recent mine flooding problems.

    Here's a comment that I got via email from one reader who sleuthed this out as ERA, too:

    "It's questionable if you'd want to buy this stock, given that
    they just announced that their Australian operations were recently disrupted
    due to heavy rain and floods - and they declared force majeure on some of
    their supply contracts. The CEO also said that they expect their uranium
    production to be lower by about 35% over the year. However, they do have
    excellent resource base and good uranium producing properties, so I don't
    know - may be worth a shot if you don't have high quality exposure to
    uranium already in your portfolio."

    I, of course, don't know if that's true ... but one more perspective for you.