I talked to you about Macmillan nott too long ago when it was at 27¢.Now its at $1.00. ButI sold out too early. Worried over a coming major correction in the precious metals...though it seems so unlikely with the dollar going nowhere but down.Time will tell. I hope some of you took a bit of money off the table with Montello...just to be on the safe side. I sold a bit to bring down my average to about 10¢. I do hope they succeed . NOw for a new stock I fell upon last week. 10 bagger possibility within 3 weeks. You are the first people to hear about this stock because I just discovered it and haven't had time to talk to others yet. The company is called Portrush (PSH.V) 1-They have 10% participation in deep wells in MISSion River. That is their bread and butter. They make about $1million a year and that pays for all their expenses including their drilling. 2-They are almost finished drilling ( a couple of days left) a well in Ontario where they have 87%working interest (even though on their website they speak of 50%, they have corrected that in one of their news releases and I got it confirmed over the telephone by the IR man). They are drilling a gas reservoir the size of which is about 1200 feet by 2300 feet. Their reservoir is situated between 2 other reservoirs that have already produced about 6 billion cubic feet each. It took the company 27 years to buy out all the farmers. So there are high hopes riding on this field and management believes it could be a company maker. The reservoir is not quite as big as the other two but 3-4 billion cubic feet seems very reasonable. If they were able to produce just 3million cubic feet a day at 6$ per 1000 cubic ft, that would earn the company about $18,000 per day, $ 540,000. a month, 6,570,000 with very little expense.
What is beautiful: it trades at .07¢, they are very low profile, and there are only 44-45 million shares. Even without the Ontario property, they are very undervalued in my opinion. The company wants to grow but safely, so they won't take high risks. There is very little downside to the stock even if the Ontario well doesn't come through. The news went unnoticed. So one shouldn't get hurt and with new wells from Mission River coming on stream will help the stock move back to the 25-50 cent area where it belongs.
Likewise 10bagger good to hear from you again. I still have my holdings of AUL (decided the lesser no. shares gave better exposure than MEO) and like everyone else am waiting on results. Will start doing my DD on PSH. Thanks for the heads up and best of luck to you. Cheers
I haven't done a full due diligence yet. Haven't read through all their reports or filings. I picked up about 100,000 shares over a few of days because the gamble seems worth it. If it strikes like it should it takes off to 70¢ easily in my mind. 50¢ would be good too and 1.00 a lot better. It's being accumulated at these prices for some time and apparently the stock is fairly tightly held so I'd be surprised if it goes to 4¢. If it does I'll buy more for the longer term. Their Mission River participation with very little risk will provide them with money for years to com. I think if people hear about this stock and jump in it shouldn't take long to get rid of the cheap sellers. Longer term, junior energy cos. will have their day. In general they are way underpriced. And there is supposed to be a significant shortage in natural gas next year at this time and 15$ for a 1000 cfeet is very plausible. In any case, these types of gambles aren't for every one. The downside seems minimal compared to the upside and 45 million shares for a small company making money is quite interesting.
1-About a week ago I got a secretary on the phone. Since then it's a machine. However I did get hold of the IR man Try this number:Lindsay Malcolm Telephone (604) 696-2555 866-939-2555
2- Willy-I'd like to know what stock options were given to the CEO and where you found this info.. I looked for it and didn't see anything special. I think the options given to the employees is a way to raise cash for the company. I also doubt like hell the CEO is going to dump any stock for a while since management is long term minded.The IR man said they weren't really interested in promoting the stock since they wanted to build a company first. I will eventually get hold of the CEO even though he lives I think in Ireland and question him more deeply.
Sorry for not formatting it. But I think it will answer your question. There are around $2 m stock options around.
comes from CapitalIQ:
Stock Option Grants in Fiscal 2006 Ended 12/31/2006 ____________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________
Percentage Market Value of Securities Number of Exer. Underlying Options of Total Price on Date Options Options Per Grant Expiration of Grant Name Granted Granted Share Date Date Per Share ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Cotter 1,500,000 55.0% $0.15 4/10/2006 4/10/2009 $0.17 Wes Franklin 0 0.0% Neal Iverson 100,000 4.0% $0.15 4/10/2006 4/10/2009 $0.17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Employees/Consultants 1,125,000 41.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL 2,725,000 100.0%
Aggregated Stock Options Exercised in Fiscal 2006 Fiscal Yearend Unexercised Stock Options Fiscal Yearend Stock Option Values Senior Management/Directors ____________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Number Value of Unexercised of Number of In-the Money Shares Unexercised Options Options at Acquired Aggregate at Fiscal Yearend Fiscal Yearend on Value Exercisable/ Exercisable/ Name Exercise Realized Unexercisable Unexercisable ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Cotter 0 $0 1,500,000/ nil $nil/ $nil Wes Franklin 0 $0 300,000/ nil $nil/ $nil Neal Iverson 100,000 $15,000 200,000/ nil $nil/ $nil Subtotal 100,000 $15,000 2,000,000/ nil $nil/ $nil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Others 525,000 $78,750 1,880,000/ nil $nil/ $nil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 625,000 $93,750 3,000,000/ nil $nil/ $nil
So if I understand well, there are about 3 million options and probably all exercisable above .15¢. So that gives us a sort of safety net and the fully diluted shares would be about 48 million which is still very good in my book. Thanks for the data.
10bag: I'm not sure what you meant by your statement: I think the options given to the employees is a way to raise cash for the company. What exactly do you mean by that. How do options raise cash for the company? The only way employees would give up their cash is if the stock option price was "in the money". And that don't raise money, it just sells them the stock at a discounted price. Perhaps I am missing something here?
Maybe your right. Some Ceo from another company told me they sold stock to the employees to raise money without having to go public. I figured maybe they give them options to buy stock directly from the company. Maybe I'm all wrong here. I'm going to try to remember who I spoke to the other day and see how it all fits in. I learn something every day. Thanks for Feed back At the track It gets me thinking.
employee stock options are not sold to the employees. They are used as an inducement to keep the employee with the company. For instance, I receive options where I work now. They are issued every other year for me. The option price is set using a day specific, usually the day before it is ussued, as the future strike price. For instance, this last round I received 5,000 shares with a strike price of $26. These vest over a five year period. In other words, one year from now, I can buy, or cash in, 20% of those shares for $26. Provided the then current price is higher, I could cash them in if I wanted to. If the price is $30, I can convert the one thousand shares (20% of 5,000) to either $4,000 in cash (which counts as personal income, not long term gains), or let it ride hoping the price will be higher in the future. And I have 5 sets of options over the last 10 years that are in various stages of vesting (some 100%). The CEO you talked with could well be right in that they sell stock to the employees without having to go public. Any company that is incorporated has shares. That's how the corporations are set up. And they can sell those shares directly to the employees as a way to raise money. But you don't sell them options, you grant them options.
what is a good online broker that i can purchase these low priced stocks your always pushing if i choose to. I cant purchase a lot of these stocks if i wanted to because they dont meet certain criterias. Thanks
1-at-the-track: Thanks for info. More questions about options: Whe you exercise opitions you mean the company offers you shares that you can buy at a fixed price for so many years. Where does the company take those shares? From the market? It's holdings?
2-vrian9240. I hate that when people say I'm pushing shares. I'm not. I discover stuff that I think others can get in on if they choose. This is another gambling situation with fairly little downside risk. But I'm playing Portrush because I like the odds. If it goes up to 15 cents I'll will sell 30 % of my holdings to protect myself. I deal with 3 online brokers and use mostly CIBC because Inow pay a $6.95 commission because they offer a deal of 50 trades for something like 375$ and once you've done 50 trades you get to pay $6.95. Maybe somebody else can help you better. From what I can tell, you can't afford to gamble on these kinds of plays. If it doesn't feel right don't touch it. If you are a conservative investor, put away some cash and wait for good market corrections even if it takes 6 months. I'm remaining 50% in cash waiting for those kind of opportunities. There are safer longer term 10 baggers out there . You have to be patient. For example, I was watching (HVG) Harvest Gold for 2 years. Bought some in March 07 at .15 cents and sold them for 25. in August. BOught them back at .17 cents about 10 days ago, they are now .37 cents. This company is a 10 bagger in my book.I like their properties. But I wouldn't buy it at these prices unless they came out with great news on a bad market day. Otherwise. I'll wait for a pull back in the 20-25 cents area to buy more. If we get a steep gold correction and market correction over the next month ( I sort of expect it) most stocks will drop and Harvard could be right back at 17-18 cents unless it keeps climbing to 60-70 cents over the next few days which I doubt. Today I bought 3000 shares of AZA at .59cents. I knew I was paying too much but it doesn't really matter because I'Ll be averaging down over the next month and my goal is to buy at least 10,000 shares and maybe 15000 depending on the price it goes down to. We should see it go back to the high 40's in the next few days. I like this company because its owns 100% of the property it is drilling in one of Argentina 's good basins. It has 375,000 acres of land. It has 3 X 100% properties in Argentina and 1X100% in Columbia. I could have bought shares at .40 cents a few months back but hesitated because they have 108 million shares fully diluted. I prefer companies with less than 50 million. I gain nothing and lose nothing by sharing stock information. If you like what I present, good. If not...pass. Do your due diligence. Hope all this helps someone.
Thanks for the response I didn't mean anything negative with the "pushing stocks" comment other than the stocks you recommend. Obviously everyone should do their own diligent homework and I love hearing others research and opinions so keep the recommendations coming.
10bagger: you're essentially correct. When i receive my option award, in my case, they are offering me the option to buy x shares in the future at a set price. In my example, I was granted the option to purchase 5,000 shares in the future at a fixed price of $26. They vest at the rate of 20% per year. So I can exercise those options 1,000 shares each year. 1 year later, I can purchase 1,000 shares at $26. In three years, if i have done nothing, i have 3,000 shares that I can purchase at $26 per share. 5 years, 5,000 shares. However, i do not have to purchase them outright. I can exercise that option through the company's broker by having them just sell the shares on the open market and pocket the difference, without ever putting up any of my own money. So if in three years the stock is worth $40, i can sell the 3,000 shares and pocket the $14 per share difference, giving me a gross of $42,000. The shares come out of the authorized shares that a company has. when they are converted, they are taken out of the authorized shares and become outstanding shares. I don't want to confuse the issue, but the authorized shares of a company are the total shares that they can issue to raise capital. The outstanding shares are the ones that they have issued to raise capital. the options given to employees almost always come from the authorized shares. Stock options are generally granted with the intention of keeping specific employees with the company, preventing them from leaving and taking their knowledge and expertise with them. After 10 years of this, I'm at the point where I have literally thousands of options vesting each year. So i'm not going anywhere. The options i got 10 years ago are 100% vested, 8 years ago 100% vested, 6 years ago 100% vested, 4 years ago 80% vested, so they all add up. So more than 20,000 vested so far. see what i mean/ But when you leave the company, all options expire. So if you're leaving the company, make sure you cash in your options prior to giving your notice.
at-the-track Great stuff. Never been so clear. I'll be copying this stuff into a special folder to help others understand how options work. I really want to thank you. This info will be greatly appreciated for years to come.All the best to you.
10bagger: I did think of one other possible scenario. Most public companies have a capability for the employees to do payroll deduct to purchase shares. The employee selects a constant paycheck amount, say $100, to be deducted from each paycheck. At a specified time, usually once a quarter, that money is distributed to their underwriter to purchase shares for them thru the open market. So no financial benefit to the company. But, some companies actually subsidize the purchase, allowing the employee to get a 15% discount (or thereabouts) to purchase the stock. If so, it's possible that the employees end up purchasing shares from the authorized pool, not the outstanding shares on the open market. So, in essence, they would raise money for the company this way. Otherwise the company would have to pony up 15% of the price to directly subsidize the purchase on the open market. And they don't like that.
Let's say you have options on your company's stock at $26 per share and you decide to exercise the options and hold hte stock. If the stock is at $40 when you exercise the option to buy it at $26, the $14 per share difference immediately becomes taxable income. That's why most people hold the options until they decide to exercise them.
When the bubble burst back in 2000, a number of people got into trouble with the IRS because they had exercised their options above the strike price, but held their shares until they were worth less than the strike price. If they had sold their stock the same year they exercised their options, they would have been OK. Instead, the held the shares until the next year, when they had lost much of their value. Since capital gain losses are capped at $3000 per year, they took a beating.
The tax code could have changed since then, but I haven't followed up.
Personally, my options were worth over $300K at one point, but I wasn't vested any at all until after the third year. They were worthless by that point.
Thanks to both of you for all your input. It will surely help others on the forum who, like me, have never had the opportunity to work for companies that gave options.
I've sussed out Portrush (PSH - X) and see that it is trading at .09 as of Oct.19 with a 2 star rating from Globeinvestor. It actually went up not down on the day. I'm tempted to jump in based on your recommendations and was wondering if you are still bullish on this one? How do you feel about Harvest Gold (HVG) right now?
In a recent teaser for his Quantum Growth newsletter, Louis Navallier, teases us with his top 5 stocks set to rocket to the stars. He actually names the first one; GigaMedia (GIGM), which I ran out and bought. L.N.'s track record is decent but not stellar. I've sold more of his initial recommendations on his call with a break even that a stellar profit. He did get me into Apple last year, and Crox earlier this year for which I am grateful. I also bought Garmin and his word and held onto it even after he told us to sell. Now he's back telling us to buy GRMN, so you gotta be your own Guru most of the time and do what feels good in yer gut.
Hi Stocklord Portrush seems to be underpriced just because of the Mission river participation. Talk to the IR guy. See phone number already given previously. The Ontario well to me is dessert on the cake and I don't understand why the stock is not already at 20¢ except that maybe there is a lot of general negative sentiments out there. I made my purchase at 7-71/2 cents. Didn't get all I wanted and won't chase it .It is still cheap I think at current prices if they strike anything decent. I still haven't done a full due diligence on it and probably won't because I like this Ont. play so much.But these are my feelings and it doesn't mean they are correct.
As for Harvest Gold, I paid .175 cents for them a couple of weeks ago and it took off almost immediately. I sold 1/3 at .34 cents so it brings my average down to 10 cents. If it goes below .24 I' ll be buying back as long as the markets aren't in full crash. If such is the case I might sell another 20% at .28-.30 cents. These are difficult days in the market and I keep warning people:keep lots of cash.Better days will come. Even at 50% invested in the market, as I am now, this is way too much for me but I can't make up my mind what to sell...and I'm going to have to if the markets are in serious crash mode. I'm actually trying to wait for Tuesday to see what happens to interest rates and see also if anything comes out of the G7 meetings. If the dollar gets supported big time, down goes gold and gold stocks. If not and interest rates fall again, up goes gold(inflation). ..and perhaps the markets. It's all pretty complicated I find.
2007-10-22 13:49 ET - News Release Mr. Martin Cotter reports PORTRUSH COMMENCES DRILLING IN ONTARIO Portrush Petroleum Corp. has been advised that the drilling contractor has commenced drilling the Portrush No. 1-Moore 5-13-III in Moore township, Lambton county, Southwestern Ontario. The six-billion-cubic-foot prospect is located in the heart of gas-storage country on trend and midpoint between two pinnacle reef gas storage pools, Kimball Colinville and Waubuno. The operator anticipates reaching total depth by mid-November.
The Waubuno pool produced 6.01 billion cubic feet before being converted to gas storage and this pinnacle reef prospect is postulated to have a similar reservoir with slightly less volume of gas in place.
Due to leasing problems the drilling has been delayed for 37 years. The leasing problem was resolved through force pooling in February, 2007. Portrush Petroleum holds an 89-per-cent interest in the project.
The project involves 150 acres all of which have been spaced through Moore 5-13-III spacing order 2005-8. In 2006, a pooling order application was made to the Mining and Lands Commissioner and was granted as No. OG-003-6 on Feb. 5, 2007. The pooling order effectively forces a P&NG lease on the holdout with terms identical to the leases signed by the remainder of the lessors.
The prospect is favourably located with respect to a Union Gas pipeline tie-in located on the Kimball Side Road approximately 1.55 miles from the prospect.
Have you heard anything about a stock called Canadian Imperial Venture (CQV.V) ?
I´ve heard it could be an easy 5-bagger in the next months. I know that they have started 2 drillings.
Volume has increased and it seems that it could run up all the way. I´ve seen it has 400 million shares outstanding which I think is too much, but you never know.
I will do my DD this weekend and will see if I buy some shares on monday.
Who else keeps an eye on the high-tech startup company that aims to turn old Soviet plutonium warheads into electricity for Russia, and maybe keep even keep nukes out of the hands of terrorists? The company says it is within arm's reach of turning plutonium warheads into electricity. All it takes is persuading the U.S. government to back the plan.
The 52 week high low runs $.15 to $.44. It's off 5 cents today at $.39. I was a Johnny-come-lately. Jumped in when the new CEO took over. At the time the price was $.27.
Just some background info. I had Thorium power on my screen - but in my alzheimer moment (6 months actually) - it fell off my screen. Thorium is poor man's uranium - several countries that are uranium, O&G challenged, are looking to develop Thoruim power plants (India is proabably the lead here, and has several projects ongoing). The technology is a bit tricky, not a sure thing, so I cant say if the company has a handle on this - but they do have a few projects to demonstrate feasibility. In view of the stock runup, the market has voted on their technology?
I might step in here to "take umbrage" with the statement that Thorium is "poor man's uranium" that is far afield of the facts. The benefits of this safer nuclear play is numerous:
1) More abundant, cheaper fuel than uranium. 2) Safe from the 'Chernobyl' Effect every one worries about - solid controlled reactions that don't go "POP" 3) Burns & brakes down the weapon & depleted toxic stuff that needs 100,000 + years to break down 4) Safe short toxic life
Hurdles - every controling interest in the nuclear materials industry (semi-joking) the technology works, will take some time for contracts (5-7 years) The bonus: The material byproduct does not create a nuclear weapon! So countries who use it don't have to worry about the US of A knocking at there door wanting to over throw their government. think of the tax dollars we'll save $$$
BTW I've enjoyed some nice trades on this stock with in the market range of .18 to .28 cents (in & out) right now, probably "over bought". Just my 2 cents. Regards.
It was structured improperly when the reverse merger took place. It really is ashame. If reverse mergers are not structured properly they taint the new public merged company.
Following up on Hexdek 16's reference to THPW's 5 - 7 year program, I'm pushing 78 and bght this stock in a corp owned by my grandchildren. I considered it a crap shoot worth the gamble for them way out in the future.
clarification to hexdek - sorry, what I meant was pound for pound (or rad for rad), thorium is not as effective in producing elec as uranium. It is more abundant, but purification technology (needed) is not as advanced as uranium....
K, I'll meet you on that point - although I have to say for the record the disposal of 'hot' material break down and storage times is extremely low compared to U also the recycle benefit and peaceful energy production makes it sooo very attractive. Honestly though, it's a tough road to hoe getting it to wide spread acceptance.